Theology of Religions

Having done the course on Theology of Religion do you find yourself personally transformed in your attitude towards other religions? Explain.
I find myself personally transformed and challenged to learn more and personalise the issues that are behind the reality of religious pluralism. We have to accept the fact that today in India to be religious is to be inter-religious. In our day to day affairs we are being forced to interact with people of other religions and most of these religions have much more followers than we Christians are. In this context, I have a change in attitude, a wider vision and an inclusive approach to this pluralistic situation of our country.
These are the various areas I find myself enlightened, inspired and challenged: First of all I see that my idea God of has been transformed from a Christian God to a God of the entire humanity. I am able to accept the fact that it is the same God which is worshiped by people of all faiths and religions. When I say this, it makes myself humble and enable me to see others as equal heirs to the Kingdom of God.
Secondly, with the changing idea of God, my idea of the meaning and mission of the Church has changed. Today my mission should be that of bringing humanity to God than mere teaching and preaching. Total liberation of all, bridging the gap between the rich and the poor (which is widening very much) and alleviation of poverty and hunger should be my priority as mission. Accepting all as the children of God, I should show no partiality based on any distinctions.
Along with this my idea of Jesus and the whole aspect of incarnation have changed. We should not hold too much an exclusivist Christology but accept Christ, the incarnate Word, as the One who inaugurated the Reign of God. Reign of God is transcends the Church and reaches to all humanity. So let a faith in Christ should not be a condition to inherit the Kingdom and let us not confront others in this regard. However, we have the right and duty to proclaim Christ as he is the fullness of revelation of God.
The following idea of religious pluralism by Fr M Amaladoss is very much acceptable to me. Religious pluralism does not need to make all religions the same,but is tolerant of religious differences. It does not seek to reduce all religions to a common model. It lets their differences stand out as they are and does not seek to cover them over with a veil of unity. Pluralism says that it is fine for us to have different or even contrary views about religion and this does not have to be a problem. The important thing for us is to seek truth or God in the way that is most meaningful for us.
Pluralism in religions does not require that we reduce all religions to a common mold in which their distinctions disappear into an amorphous unity. It certainly doesn't mean that we have to practice all religions or bow down to all their leaders as great and holy. Pluralism in religions does not mean that we have to believe in or accept all religions as true, regardless of what they teach. Pluralism means freedom. There should be freedom in the pursuit of the spiritual life, even if it allows others to arrive at a different understanding of truth than what we ourselves honor. This means that we should not bar people from changing their religious beliefs, nor should we seek to impose religious beliefs upon people by force or propaganda. We should give people the space to discover the truth without our interference.
In the light of this, the following insights can be highlighted. First of all the course has helped me to perceive the signs of the presence of the Absolute in our brothers and sisters irrespective of their religions. God is present and active in all people as creation and salvation belongs to the domain of God.
Again, I have developed a proper understanding of the purpose and meaning of various religions especially their existential role. Religions are supposed to help us in reaching salvation and integration not merely after our death but in the here and now situation. Religion has to do more here and now that after the death. So, all our religious practices and faith should lead us closer to God by bringing salvation and liberation to our fellow beings.
It has also helped me to speak theologically about different faiths with integrity and total respect. All religions are channels of grace of God. One must always remember that it is not the religious traditions that save people, but God himself through his Word and his Spirit. The diverse “paths” are conducive to salvation because they have been traced by God in his search for people and peoples; even though not all have the same meaning or represent the same depth of divine involvement, yet all converge in the one plan designed by God eternally. The hidden manifestation of the Word of God through the seers of other religions and through the traditions which have found their origin in them, the inspiring breath of the Spirit on their prophets and their message, as well as the historical coming of the Word made flesh in Jesus Christ and the outpouring of the Spirit through him at Pentecost to which the Christian community testifies: all combine in the overall ensemble of a unique divine plan.
What are the theological foundations for a more positive theology of religions and inter-religious dialogue in Indian context?
Hans Küng once wrote: “There can be no peace among the nations without peace among the religions. There can be no peace among the religions without dialogue between the religions. There can be no dialogue between the religions without research into theological foundations”. An open and constructive theology of the religions of the world is a pressing need if we wish to foster an inter-religious dialogue conducive to universal peace.
The recent doctrinal authority of the Church has insistently stressed the need and importance of inter-religious dialogue as part of the Church’s evangelising mission. In his Encyclical Letter Redemptoris Missio (1990) John Paul II wrote: “Dialogue does not originate from tactical concerns or self‑interest, but is an activity with its own guiding principles, requirements and dignity. It is demanded by deep respect for everything that has been brought about in human beings by the Spirit who blows where he wills. Through dialogue the Church seeks to uncover the ‘seeds of the Word’, a ‘ray of that Truth which enlightens everyone’; these are found in individuals and in the religious traditions of humankind” (n. 56).
So before going for theological foundations for a theology of religions we should stop making claims such as Christianity to be “the only true religion”, “outside the Church, no salvation”, the Church was considered the “only ark of salvation”, outside of which people were irremediably lost. We should also stop attributing people of other religions as “pagans”, “infidels”, “non‑believers” or “non‑Christians”.
Hence, the following are some of the concrete theological foundations for a theology of religions: 
First of all we should affirm our biblical faith in One God who creates and saves humanity out of love. This affirmation should be universal as God does this out of love for the humanity. And, we should, being human beings, never put limit on the saving power of God. God has his own ways of saving humanity as he does not want any of these little ones to be lost. God cannot be affiliated to only one religion. He and his saving power is manifested in multiple ways. So we should accept the universality and unlimited ness of God’s saving power.
Due to multiple cultures, languages, continents and countries we cannot deny the very fact of religious pluralism. However, the Lord treated all with the same spirit, “Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness” (Acts 14:17).
Again we should look into the new type of worship which is propagated   by Jesus himself. We should worship God in Spirit and Truth (Jn 4: 24). So a new theology should be based on this sort of worship where God is universally present and is active in the salvation of all men. When we worship God in truth and Spirit we transcend the religious differences.
Finally, I look into the aspects of Good News itself. If we look into the aspects of Good News proclaimed by Jesus, we see that many universally applicable elements are present in that. Some of them could be as follows.
Love is of God: every form of genuine and other-oriented love is from God. In the I Jn 4 we see that God is love and if we live in love we live in God. It calls us to find God in our fellowmen. So love of God is nothing but love of our neighbour. This could be the foundational base for a theology of religions. In the love command Jesus exhorts us to love others as would like to be loved. Love of our neighbour plays central role in the gospel of Luke.
Similarly in the gospel we find that Jesus exhorts us to embrace poverty than riches. The element of voluntary poverty is also central to the teachings of Jesus. “He that hath two coats, let him impart to him that hath none” (Lk 4:11), “Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me” (Mt 19:21). If all the religious followers were to accept this teaching of Jesus, we could eradicate poverty from this planet.
Finally, the most important element of the Good News is the example of Jesus in washing the feet of his disciples. This is the symbol of humility and service without any distinction. It is by this the love of God for humanity is perfected in Jesus. So, let us not be stuck with petty differences in the ritual practices and so on, but see the inner meaning of the teaching of our Spiritual teachers. All the religions will have the same sort of advice for its followers which unfortunately seldom followed.
Thus, the poor and marginalised are the terms of reference for a theology of religions and this call for a kenosis and purification of distortions of religions. There should be primacy of orthopraxis over orthodoxy. It should aim at wholeness of human, nature, cosmos and the ultimate. Preferential option for the powerless and the marginalised should be the motivation to establish the Reign of God.
The following are some practical points which will enable us towards a deeper theology of religions: It is a good idea to have inter-religious prayers which will enable us to see the various manifestations of the same Spirit present in other religions. Also entering into the holy places of other religions was never acceptable to me but now it is found to be a meaningful experience. Agape and sharing meals is also an enriching experience.
To conclude we can say that all religions are complementary perceptions of the ineffable divine mystery, the God –beyond God. All religions are visions of the divine mystery. No particular religion can raise the claim of being the norm for all others. As Religious co-pilgrims, let us walk together on the path of dialogue and service towards harmony as sisters and brothers bound in one Love and drawn by one Divine Truth. Seeds of Logos is hidden in all religions.